Author Topic: MESSENGER  (Read 41512 times)

Offline Bob B.

  • Global Moderator
  • Moonwalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 1438
  • Gender: Male
    • Rocket & Space Technology
MESSENGER
« on: September 01, 2004, 03:23:21 PM »
With Mars and Saturn getting all the attention lately it looks like the launch of NASA's MESSENGER (MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging) mission went by almost unnoticed.  It's my understanding the launch on 3-Aug-05 went as planned and, if everything continues to function properly, the spacecraft will arrive at Mercury in March 2011.

Offline evancise

  • The Right Stuff
  • Apollo CDR
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Gender: Male
    • http://vancise.blogspot.com/
MESSENGER
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2004, 03:58:07 PM »
The MESSENGER launch was cool.  It was right in the middle of the last ISS EVA.  Here's the crew out doing a space walk, then we flip one of the big screens to the video feed from the pad, listen to the countdown, watch liftoff until it's out of sight, then back to EVA.  Truly a cool night for NASA.

Offline Jirnsum

  • The Right Stuff
  • Apollo LMP
  • ****
  • Posts: 214
  • Gender: Male
    • Simphoni Central Forums
MESSENGER
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2004, 04:32:19 PM »
It was big news here on Dutch Television. Funny thing was that according to Dutch media the probe will study the earthcrust at Mercury: sounds like they would be doing that from a long way away then :p
The Law of Controversy: Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real data available

Offline Bob B.

  • Global Moderator
  • Moonwalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 1438
  • Gender: Male
    • Rocket & Space Technology
MESSENGER
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2004, 05:16:39 PM »
I didn't see a thing about the launch on TV, but maybe I was just busy and not watching much news at the time.  I seem to recall there being an article in my local newspaper but that's all I saw.  Oh yeah, either Sky & Telescope or Astronomy (don't remember which) had an article.  It will be interesting to see what MESSENGER discovers when it gets there.  Too bad we have to wait 6.5 years.

Offline Simkid

  • The Right Stuff
  • Apollo CMP
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Gender: Male
MESSENGER
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2004, 01:22:03 PM »
6.5 isn't that bad compared to the outer solar system probes, just wait till someone trys to launch somthign to another star  :wink: .

Offline Uziel

  • Stargazer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Gender: Male
MESSENGER
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2004, 10:15:37 AM »
Quote from: Simkid
6.5 isn't that bad compared to the outer solar system probes, just wait till someone trys to launch somthign to another star  :wink: .

Well I sure hope that happens in our lifetime..

Offline Simkid

  • The Right Stuff
  • Apollo CMP
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Gender: Male
MESSENGER
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2004, 10:53:04 AM »
Well, I suppose it COULD, with lots of money and nuclear rockets and no ability to slow down at the destination.

Offline Uziel

  • Stargazer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Gender: Male
MESSENGER
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2004, 08:48:04 PM »
Well Simgkid, that would be pretty cool :D . Whats the closest star near us besides the sun? Do you think we will acheve light speed travel within our lifetime? 8)  :?  :(  :)

auf bye

Offline Simkid

  • The Right Stuff
  • Apollo CMP
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Gender: Male
MESSENGER
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2004, 09:02:22 PM »
Light, I don't think so, we could probably get somthing to accelerate to about .05 light with gravity assist and a fusion reactor based nuclear rocket.  Assuming no deceleration you could probably design somthing that could get to a star within 60-100 years.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2005, 07:56:14 PM by Simkid »

Offline Jirnsum

  • The Right Stuff
  • Apollo LMP
  • ****
  • Posts: 214
  • Gender: Male
    • Simphoni Central Forums
MESSENGER
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2004, 10:18:30 AM »
.5 times light speed? You're quite the optimist Simkid ;)

Uziel: the closest star to our Sun is Alfa Centauri, at a bit more than 4 lightyears.
The Law of Controversy: Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real data available

Offline Simkid

  • The Right Stuff
  • Apollo CMP
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Gender: Male
MESSENGER
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2004, 03:55:01 PM »
Yeah, I meant .05, that gets the 60-100 year travel time, although actually, you probably wouln't need a fusion rocket, fisson should be able to do it (although I dont like the idea of launching a reactor).

Offline Uziel

  • Stargazer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Gender: Male
MESSENGER
« Reply #11 on: September 04, 2004, 07:41:20 PM »
Wow, thanks for the answers. You people are really geniouses. It would be quite amazing to get to another star, but how long would it take for signals to return to Earth?

Offline Bob B.

  • Global Moderator
  • Moonwalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 1438
  • Gender: Male
    • Rocket & Space Technology
MESSENGER
« Reply #12 on: September 04, 2004, 09:11:27 PM »
Quote from: Uziel
...but how long would it take for signals to return to Earth?

Communication signals would travel at light speed, thus the time would be equivalent to the star's distance in light years.  For instance, Alpha Centauri is 4.3 light years away so signals sent from there would take 4.3 years to reach Earth.

Offline Bob B.

  • Global Moderator
  • Moonwalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 1438
  • Gender: Male
    • Rocket & Space Technology
Re: MESSENGER
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2005, 08:17:50 PM »
Here are some pretty cool pictures and a movie of MESSENGER's flyby of Earth on 2-Aug-05.

Earth Flyby Pictures and Animations

The movie is awesome. :D

Offline LunarOrbit

  • Administrator
  • Moonwalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
  • Gender: Male
    • TheSpaceRace.com
Re: MESSENGER
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2005, 09:00:34 PM »
Cool!  8)

Wait until Bart Sibrel sees that video... he'll use it as proof that the Apollo footage of the Earth from a distance is fake because it isn't rotating as fast as it is in the Messenger video. :roll:
" We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard..."
 - John F. Kennedy