Firstly, I think that it is extremely unlikely that the moon landings were faked. Anyone that says otherwise has simply been brainwashed by these so-called documentaries, and has failed to research and discover the facts.
I think that three things provide enough evidence to support the landings. The samples brought back from the lunar surface that date back 4.5 billion years, the fact that Russia was monitoring NASA for such hoaxes, and that a hoax would be far more complicated and expensive than actually landing on the Moon. Also why would they repeat a hoax a further six times?
Besides, all of these conspiracy theories are based on photographic evidence. If you argued that the Americans had no film to show the public, and therefore faked the film, what would be their argument be to support the hoax of the entire mission?
As for the future moon landings, aren't they long-term landings? I read that the Americans are also researching 'super-dense particles' as an alternative to propellant. Possible or not, it is still fascinating. Space is our oyster!
